California’s 4% landscape.
A CDP view of every unique project on California’s 2026 four percent applicant and published final lists, connected to the people, costs and capital behind the deal.
Read the status labels. Rounds 1 and 2 have published final lists. Some applicants, including JEMCOR, are not on those lists. Round 3 has an applicant list, but no verified final award. Cost and financing fields are application estimates, not final certified costs.
The year at a glance
A quick orientation before you compare the projects.
What’s in this site
The roster includes every project on the 2026 applicant lists: projects on published Round 1 and 2 final lists, Round 3 applicants, and earlier applicants not on a final list. Repeat applications for the same project are connected in one record. Staff reports and individual e-apps add detailed costs and financing where available, with the source type labeled on each project.
Browse the sourced project directory ↗What stands out
Explore CDP strategy questions ↗Explore the projects
One record per project, with each application number kept in its history.
How projects are financed
Financing signals include staff reports and applicant e-apps. The product and cost charts below use the final list staff report subset.
Product mix
Final list projects with verified staff reports
Cost context
Median application estimates, grouped by construction type
Where CDP should look next
Research leads drawn from this roster. Each needs project level underwriting before CDP uses it as a model.
“No identified public gap” means the published permanent stack does not name an HCD, CalHFA MIP, local, or other clearly public gap source. It does not prove that the project has no soft debt. Seller financing, deferred developer fee, GP loans, and ground lease structures are displayed separately so CDP can see what filled the gap.
Four different ways the stack closes
Each example below has no named public gap source in the staff report’s permanent financing table. They still use other financing layers.
Named public funding sources
These counts describe source names in reconciled staff report capital stacks. They are application estimates, not verified closing proceeds.
What this site can prove
Official source trail
Roster and application estimates come from the three 2026 CTCAC/CDLAC applicant workbooks. Final list status, points and tie breakers come from the published Round 1 and 2 final lists. Detailed costs, developers and financing come from individual staff reports or applicant e-apps, as labeled on each record.
Coverage & limits
Deduplication uses normalized project name, city and unit count. The source application numbers stay attached to the merged record. Changed names, phases or unit counts may require manual review. A blank financing field means no verified staff report data here, not that the financing source is absent.